![]() |
|
Defective Airbag LawyersAirbags save lives, which is one reason they’ve been required in new cars since 1990 and in new light trucks since 1995. But airbags can also hurt or even kill a vehicle’s occupant if they’re deployed under the wrong circumstances. In fact, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reports that more than 260 people were killed by airbags in low-speed crashes between 1990 and 2006. Many more have sustained injuries due to airbag defects that range from minor but unsightly chemical burns to serious, permanent brain damage. As parents know, airbags can kill babies and small children, whose fragility and small stature puts them at great risk from airbags that inflate as fast as 200 miles per hour. That’s why state laws and experts recommend that children under age 13 never ride in the front seat. But adults and teens run risks from defective or improperly maintained airbags as well:
No matter what the circumstances, a death or serious injury caused by a defective airbag is one hundred percent avoidable. That’s why airbag-related recalls are one of the most common causes of automotive product recalls. Unfortunately, many auto manufacturers still routinely include defective or unsafe airbags in their new cars and trucks, negligently allowing millions of people to continue driving with a "safety feature" that could kill or disable them for life. Panish, Shea & Boyle is a nationally recognized leader in automotive defect law. Our partners have handled multiple high-profile, national auto product defect lawsuits, winning record verdicts and settlements for seriously injured clients. These include more than $55 million in Lampe v. Continental Tire, a case where defective tires led to a serious Los Angeles auto accident that left a woman paralyzed. In another case, Anderson v. General Motors, our partners won the largest jury verdict in U.S. legal history for clients who were severely burned in an accident involving a defective gas tank. The attorneys at Panish, Shea & Boyle are recognized as experts in automotive and product defect law. All are active in consumer attorneys’ organizations, and name partners frequently write and speak to other attorneys about their areas of expertise. Partners have been repeatedly nominated or recognized with professional honors such as Trial Lawyer of the Year, and take leadership roles in national class actions and other large-scale litigation. |
Product Defects
Bus Accidents
Business Litigation
Aviation Disasters
Pharmaceutical Litigation
Corporate Fraud
Government Liability
General Personal Injury
Wrongful Death
Automotive / Tire Defects
ATV/ Rhino Rollovers
More Practice Areas
Latest Firm NewsTilton v. Sempra - $15 million verdict for brain injury to minor resulting from a power company truck hitting a family vehicle. Dominguez v. San Francisco - $21 million settlement while case was on appeal. Wrongful death of 4 year-old girl. Largest settlement ever paid by San Francisco. Contreras v. State of California - $9 million settlment for amputation caused by a damaged freeway guardrail. Don Gino Dominguez v. South Central Los Angeles Regional Care Center - $2 million verdict for wrongful death of a mentally and physically disabled 39 year-old man. Health care center left man unsupervised and he choked to death. Doe v. Driver - $5.5 million settlement for death of pedestrian in an auto accident. Doe v. Oil Refinery - $6.2 Million settlement for wrongful death and personal injury caused by the collapse of tank floating roof. Avila v. Dresick Farms - $5.64 million dollar jury verdict for girl injured in truck v. van collision. Believed to be the largest verdict in the history of Imperial County, California. Konrad, et al. v. Hewlett-Packard - Lawsuit filed against Hewlett-Packard for pretexting journalists and their families Chief Warrant Officers v. Boeing, et al. - $13.55 million settlement for Army maintenance officers severely injured in the crash of Apache Longbow helicopter on a maintenance test flight during Operation Iraqi Freedom in Iraq. Does v. Doe Auto Manufacturer: confidential multimillion dollar settlement on behalf of a family involved in on-road rollover of sport utility vehicle. Does v. Van Manufacturer and Rental Company - Confidential multi-million dollar settlement on behalf of the survivors and family members of 14 church group members involved in a fifteen passenger van rollover. Hill v. Titan Tire - Confidential multi-million dollar settlement for a 42 year old man who sustained brain injuries following a tire failure on his vehicle. Dominguez v. San Francisco - $27.4 Million Verdict - Mother and 6 others witnessed a city truck driver run over her daughter on a sidewalk. City completely denied responsibility. Largest verdict ever against the City of San Francisco. Sherman v. Courrege - $25.5 Million Verdict - Wrongful death of mother, father, and son hit by a drunk driver. Sorenson v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway - $2.8 Million Verdict - Plaintiffs were parents of a 48 year-old man killed when a freight train crashed into a commuter train. Doe v. Auto Manufacturer - Major Confidential Settlement Fuel fed fire caused by defectively designed 15 passenger van rollover. Many occupants killed or severely burned. Flores v. Continental Tire - Major Confidential Settlement - Woman sustained paraplegia when the right rear tire on the family's Ford Windstar van experienced a tread belt separation, causing the vehicle to roll over. Panish, Shea & Boyle on TV - The trial attorneys at Panish, Shea & Boyle have been on numerous televisions shows because of their involvement in many high profile cases. |
Copyright © 2008 Panish, Shea & Boyle, LLP - Automobile Defect Lawyers - Los Angeles Tire Defect Attorneys - All rights reserved.
Defective Airbag Lawyer Disclaimer: The airbag defects, automobile airbag, defective airbag, defective auto product, faulty product, or other legal information presented at this site should not be considered formal legal advice, nor the formation of a lawyer or attorney client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. Please note that you are not considered a client until you have signed a retainer agreement and your case has been accepted by us.