Panish, Shea & Boyle Strength By Your Side

Settlement Ends Aspen Jet Crash Lawsuit for $11.7 Million

Aspen Daily News
By Linda Deutch/AP Special Correspondent

LOS ANGELES – The families of three people among 18 killed in a charter jet crash in Aspen accepted $11.7 million Monday in a last-minute settlement with the plane’s operators.

The settlement of the lawsuit was revealed as a jury was about to being the punitive phase of a trial in which the panel had already awarded the families $10.2 million in compensatory damages.

"This matter has been resolved," Superior Court Judge Susan Bryan-Deeson told the jurors. "The parties have settled in total."

The Gulfstream HI jet operated by Avjet Corp. of Burank, Calif, was carrying 15 passengers from the Los Angeles area to a birthday party and ski weekend when it hit a hillside on approach to Aspen airport on March 29, 2001. The passengers, pilot, co-pilot and flight attendant were killed.

Plaintiffs attorney Brian Panish said outside court that Avjet Corp. and the estate of pilot Robert Frisbie agreed to pay $9.5 million to the family of victim Marissa Witham and $2.2 million to the grandparents of two young men, Jose and Joseph Aguilar, who were also on the flight.

Witham was an intern at Fox television station KTTV in Los Angeles. Her parents said outside court that she had planned a career in television and hope to become a news anchor.

"She was a perfect angel from birth," said her tearful mother, Laurece Witham, who held a photograph of her 22-year-old daughter.

She said her daughter had asked permission of her parents to go on the trip and it was granted. Her father is a retired airline pilot and her brother is a pilot for Continental Express.

Asked if she was satisfied with the award, Laurece Witham said, "I would like to see Avjet go out of business. I would like to see no one fly Avjet ever again."

Martin Rose, the attorney representing Avjet and the pilot’s estate, said he was pleased with the settlement. He said that all other cases brought by the families of the other victims had been settled.

"The crew was highly experienced," he said. "They made some mistakes."

Jury forewoman Vanessa Smith of Carson said the panel was surprised by the settlement and would have awarded more money if the case had continued.

During the trial, the plaintiffs attorney said two planes ahead of the jet tried the approach but turned away because visibility was bad. Avjet’s attorney said a cockpit voice recorded showed the pilots discussed a curfew for landing at the airport after sunset and determined they had enough time.

The Gulfstream was operated by Avjet and registered to Airborne Charter Inc., which is owned by the movie company Cinergi Pictures Entertainment Inc.

Latest Firm News

Tilton v. Sempra - $15 million verdict for brain injury to minor resulting from a power company truck hitting a family vehicle.

Dominguez v. San Francisco - $21 million settlement while case was on appeal. Wrongful death of 4 year-old girl. Largest settlement ever paid by San Francisco.

Contreras v. State of California - $9 million settlment for amputation caused by a damaged freeway guardrail.

Don Gino Dominguez v. South Central Los Angeles Regional Care Center - $2 million verdict for wrongful death of a mentally and physically disabled 39 year-old man. Health care center left man unsupervised and he choked to death.

Doe v. Driver - $5.5 million settlement for death of pedestrian in an auto accident.

Doe v. Oil Refinery - $6.2 Million settlement for wrongful death and personal injury caused by the collapse of tank floating roof.

Avila v. Dresick Farms - $5.64 million dollar jury verdict for girl injured in truck v. van collision. Believed to be the largest verdict in the history of Imperial County, California.

Konrad, et al. v. Hewlett-Packard - Lawsuit filed against Hewlett-Packard for pretexting journalists and their families

Chief Warrant Officers v. Boeing, et al. - $13.55 million settlement for Army maintenance officers severely injured in the crash of Apache Longbow helicopter on a maintenance test flight during Operation Iraqi Freedom in Iraq.

Does v. Doe Auto Manufacturer: confidential multimillion dollar settlement on behalf of a family involved in on-road rollover of sport utility vehicle.

Does v. Van Manufacturer and Rental Company - Confidential multi-million dollar settlement on behalf of the survivors and family members of 14 church group members involved in a fifteen passenger van rollover.

Hill v. Titan Tire - Confidential multi-million dollar settlement for a 42 year old man who sustained brain injuries following a tire failure on his vehicle.

Dominguez v. San Francisco - $27.4 Million Verdict - Mother and 6 others witnessed a city truck driver run over her daughter on a sidewalk. City completely denied responsibility. Largest verdict ever against the City of San Francisco.

Sherman v. Courrege - $25.5 Million Verdict - Wrongful death of mother, father, and son hit by a drunk driver.

Sorenson v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway - $2.8 Million Verdict - Plaintiffs were parents of a 48 year-old man killed when a freight train crashed into a commuter train.

Doe v. Auto Manufacturer - Major Confidential Settlement Fuel fed fire caused by defectively designed 15 passenger van rollover. Many occupants killed or severely burned.

Flores v. Continental Tire - Major Confidential Settlement - Woman sustained paraplegia when the right rear tire on the family's Ford Windstar van experienced a tread belt separation, causing the vehicle to roll over.

Panish, Shea & Boyle on TV - The trial attorneys at Panish, Shea & Boyle have been on numerous televisions shows because of their involvement in many high profile cases.

11111 Santa Monica Blvd. Suite 700 Los Angeles CA 90025 • P:310-477-1700 • F: 310-477-1699 • Toll Free: 1-866-992-1700

Copyright © 2008 Panish, Shea & Boyle - Los Angeles Personal Injury Lawyers - Los Angeles Trial Attorneys - All rights reserved.

Plane Crash Lawyer Disclaimer: The personal injury, wrongful death, catastrophic injury, or other legal information presented at this site should not be considered formal legal advice, nor the formation of a lawyer or attorney client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. Please note that you are not considered a client until you have signed a retainer agreement and your case has been accepted by us.

Sitemap