![]() |
|
TOP VERDICTS OF 2005The Daily Journal Elizabeth Dominguez, a 4-year-old San Franciscan, died instantly and violently when a city worker driving a Muni repair truck plowed her into a pizza parlor in the city’s Mission District. At the time, her mother, her classmate Monica Valencia and Valencia’s grandmother were walking the two young girls home from school. They hired Brian Panish, of Panish Shea & Boyle, and filed a civil suit. The city decided to fight it. "They took the position that there was no liability, that he didn’t run the red light and that it was some other car’s fault," Panish said. The jury held the city liable and awarded $27.4 million in civil penalties for the family. Dominguez’s parents received $20.5 million for her death, for witnessing the death and the value of the relationship. Monica Valencia received $3.5 million and her grandmother received $3.3 million. Dominguez v. San Francisco, CV03-CGC422963, (S.F. Super. Ct., filed July 31, 2003.) However, the San Francisco city attorney’s office successfully challenged the noneconomic awards as excessive, Judge James McBride found that the jury had been too sympathetic to Dominguez’s family and reduced the awards to the parents from $20.5 million to $15 million. Under the jury’s award, Sylvia Lopez received $10 million for the past and future suffering from seeing her daughter crushed. She and her husband received an additional $5 million for the past and future value of their relationship with their daughter. The judge reduced the latter award to $3.5 million for each parent and $8 million to Lopez for witnessing the event. According to the court documents, the two girls and the grandmother had crossed the street at 24th Street and Potrero Avenue when the Muni repair truck driver negligently sped through the intersection. He collided with another car, which pushed his truck up onto the curb, colliding with Elizabeth and "traumatically amputation her brain from its stem." Panish said that paramedics who arrived at the scene testified in court that they needed counseling after seeing the young girl’s body embedded in the wall. A city probation officer told Panish in a video deposition shown to jurors that she saw the Muni driver run the red light, though she refused to testify in court. Finally, the Muni driver testified but refused to apologize. The city also refused to apologize, Panish said. Panish also had requested a letter of apology signed by San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom but never received it. Still, he said the jury understood how traumatic the event was for the family. "It was the most emotional trial I’ve ever been through," he said. |
Product Defects
Bus Accidents
Business Litigation
Aviation Disasters
Pharmaceutical Litigation
Corporate Fraud
Government Liability
General Personal Injury
Wrongful Death
Automotive / Tire Defects
ATV/ Rhino Rollovers
More Practice Areas
Latest Firm NewsTilton v. Sempra - $15 million verdict for brain injury to minor resulting from a power company truck hitting a family vehicle. Dominguez v. San Francisco - $21 million settlement while case was on appeal. Wrongful death of 4 year-old girl. Largest settlement ever paid by San Francisco. Contreras v. State of California - $9 million settlment for amputation caused by a damaged freeway guardrail. Don Gino Dominguez v. South Central Los Angeles Regional Care Center - $2 million verdict for wrongful death of a mentally and physically disabled 39 year-old man. Health care center left man unsupervised and he choked to death. Doe v. Driver - $5.5 million settlement for death of pedestrian in an auto accident. Doe v. Oil Refinery - $6.2 Million settlement for wrongful death and personal injury caused by the collapse of tank floating roof. Avila v. Dresick Farms - $5.64 million dollar jury verdict for girl injured in truck v. van collision. Believed to be the largest verdict in the history of Imperial County, California. Konrad, et al. v. Hewlett-Packard - Lawsuit filed against Hewlett-Packard for pretexting journalists and their families Chief Warrant Officers v. Boeing, et al. - $13.55 million settlement for Army maintenance officers severely injured in the crash of Apache Longbow helicopter on a maintenance test flight during Operation Iraqi Freedom in Iraq. Does v. Doe Auto Manufacturer: confidential multimillion dollar settlement on behalf of a family involved in on-road rollover of sport utility vehicle. Does v. Van Manufacturer and Rental Company - Confidential multi-million dollar settlement on behalf of the survivors and family members of 14 church group members involved in a fifteen passenger van rollover. Hill v. Titan Tire - Confidential multi-million dollar settlement for a 42 year old man who sustained brain injuries following a tire failure on his vehicle. Dominguez v. San Francisco - $27.4 Million Verdict - Mother and 6 others witnessed a city truck driver run over her daughter on a sidewalk. City completely denied responsibility. Largest verdict ever against the City of San Francisco. Sherman v. Courrege - $25.5 Million Verdict - Wrongful death of mother, father, and son hit by a drunk driver. Sorenson v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway - $2.8 Million Verdict - Plaintiffs were parents of a 48 year-old man killed when a freight train crashed into a commuter train. Doe v. Auto Manufacturer - Major Confidential Settlement Fuel fed fire caused by defectively designed 15 passenger van rollover. Many occupants killed or severely burned. Flores v. Continental Tire - Major Confidential Settlement - Woman sustained paraplegia when the right rear tire on the family's Ford Windstar van experienced a tread belt separation, causing the vehicle to roll over. Panish, Shea & Boyle on TV - The trial attorneys at Panish, Shea & Boyle have been on numerous televisions shows because of their involvement in many high profile cases. |
Copyright © 2008 Panish, Shea & Boyle - Los Angeles Personal Injury Attorneys - Los Angeles Trial Lawyers - All rights reserved.
Wrongful Death Lawyer Disclaimer: The personal injury, wrongful death, catastrophic injury, or other legal information presented at this site should not be considered formal legal advice, nor the formation of a lawyer or attorney client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. Please note that you are not considered a client until you have signed a retainer agreement and your case has been accepted by us.