![]() |
|
Jury Awards $5.6 Million for Imperial County Crash InjuriesThe Daily Journal September 14, 2007 A jury has awarded $5.6 million to a woman who was seriously injured when a minivan she was riding in was struck by a farm truck at a crossroads in Imperial County six years ago. The Superior Court jury in El Centro rendered its verdict Monday after a monthlong trial to determine the size of the award. Avila v. Dresick Farms, L-00916 (Imperial County Super. Ct. Sept. 10, 2007). Dresick Farms, owner of the truck, earlier admitted negligence on the part of the driver. Teresa Gonzalez, who was 15 at the time of the accident, will receive $2.5 million for pain and suffering, $1.2 million for ongoing medical expenses and $1.9 million for other expenses under the verdict. "It am very happy with the verdict for that venue," said lead attorney Brian Panish of San Diego firm Panish Hoey and Los Angeles firm Panish, Shay & Boyle. "[Gonzalez] will now be able to get the medical care she needs, the therapy, and move on with her life." During the six years after the collision, Gonzales underwent 21 surgeries to repair the damage to her face, jaw and skull, Panish said. He said because of the accident and ongoing recovery, Gonzalez, now 21, was unable to finish high school. She will need more surgery along with treatment for depression stemming from her injuries, he said. Gonzalez's father, who was the van's driver, and six other passengers settled claims against Dresick without going to trial. Dan Bacalski, who along with Denise Serino of Bacalski Ottoson represented Dresick Farms, said he is "very pleased" with the size of the award. Bacalski said the verdict was close to the $5 million settlement that Dresick Farms offered just before the trial began. James Hoey, the other name partner of Panish Hoey, and Spencer Lucas, an attorney with Panish, Shea & Boyle, also served as plaintiffs' attorneys in the case. The award paled in comparison to the largest personal injury verdict in the state this year, the $55 million judgment in Mraz v. DaimlerChrysler Co., BC332487 (Los Angeles Super. Ct., filed March 2, 2007). Mraz involved the death of a man who was killed when his truck ran him over because of an alleged manufacturer's defect that caused the vehicle to spontaneously reverse after he stepped out of it. |
Train Accidents
Product Defects
Bus Accidents
Business Litigation
Aviation Disasters
Pharmaceutical Litigation
Corporate Fraud
Government Liability
General Personal Injury
Wrongful Death
Automotive / Tire Defects
ATV/ Rhino Rollovers
More Practice Areas
Latest Firm NewsTilton v. Sempra - $15 million verdict for brain injury to minor resulting from a power company truck hitting a family vehicle. Dominguez v. San Francisco - $21 million settlement while case was on appeal. Wrongful death of 4 year-old girl. Largest settlement ever paid by San Francisco. Contreras v. State of California - $9 million settlment for amputation caused by a damaged freeway guardrail. Don Gino Dominguez v. South Central Los Angeles Regional Care Center - $2 million verdict for wrongful death of a mentally and physically disabled 39 year-old man. Health care center left man unsupervised and he choked to death. Doe v. Driver - $5.5 million settlement for death of pedestrian in an auto accident. Doe v. Oil Refinery - $6.2 Million settlement for wrongful death and personal injury caused by the collapse of tank floating roof. Avila v. Dresick Farms - $5.64 million dollar jury verdict for girl injured in truck v. van collision. Believed to be the largest verdict in the history of Imperial County, California. Konrad, et al. v. Hewlett-Packard - Lawsuit filed against Hewlett-Packard for pretexting journalists and their families Chief Warrant Officers v. Boeing, et al. - $13.55 million settlement for Army maintenance officers severely injured in the crash of Apache Longbow helicopter on a maintenance test flight during Operation Iraqi Freedom in Iraq. Does v. Doe Auto Manufacturer: confidential multimillion dollar settlement on behalf of a family involved in on-road rollover of sport utility vehicle. Does v. Van Manufacturer and Rental Company - Confidential multi-million dollar settlement on behalf of the survivors and family members of 14 church group members involved in a fifteen passenger van rollover. Hill v. Titan Tire - Confidential multi-million dollar settlement for a 42 year old man who sustained brain injuries following a tire failure on his vehicle. Dominguez v. San Francisco - $27.4 Million Verdict - Mother and 6 others witnessed a city truck driver run over her daughter on a sidewalk. City completely denied responsibility. Largest verdict ever against the City of San Francisco. Sherman v. Courrege - $25.5 Million Verdict - Wrongful death of mother, father, and son hit by a drunk driver. Sorenson v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway - $2.8 Million Verdict - Plaintiffs were parents of a 48 year-old man killed when a freight train crashed into a commuter train. Doe v. Auto Manufacturer - Major Confidential Settlement Fuel fed fire caused by defectively designed 15 passenger van rollover. Many occupants killed or severely burned. Flores v. Continental Tire - Major Confidential Settlement - Woman sustained paraplegia when the right rear tire on the family's Ford Windstar van experienced a tread belt separation, causing the vehicle to roll over. Panish, Shea & Boyle on TV - The trial attorneys at Panish, Shea & Boyle have been on numerous televisions shows because of their involvement in many high profile cases. |
Copyright © 2008 Panish, Shea & Boyle - Los Angeles Personal Injury Attorneys - Los Angeles Trial Lawyers - All rights reserved.
Catastrophic Injury Attorney Disclaimer: The personal injury, wrongful death, catastrophic injury, or other legal information presented at this site should not be considered formal legal advice, nor the formation of a lawyer or attorney client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. Please note that you are not considered a client until you have signed a retainer agreement and your case has been accepted by us.