Panish, Shea & Boyle Strength By Your Side

Families of Victims in Aspen Plane Crash Awarded $10.2 Million

Associated Press

July 2, 2003

LOS ANGELES - A Southern California charter jet company must pay $10.2 million to families of three people killed in the 2001 plane crash near the Aspen airport, a jury ruled Wednesday.

Burbank-based Avjet Corp. was ordered to pay Lyle and Laurence Witham $4.25 million each for the death of their daughter, 22-year-old Marissa Witham, a news employee at Fox affiliate KTTV.

The company must also pay $1.7 million to Aurora Garcia, whose grandsons Jose and Joseph Aguilar were also killed in the crash.

The eight-man, four-woman panel also found sufficient evidence of wrongdoing to permit the two families to seek punitive damages against Avjet and the heirs of Robert Frisbie, who piloted the plane and also perished in the March 29, 2001, crash.

The jurors were to return to court Monday to hear evidence in the punitive phase of the trial.

Kathy Tinckert, a spokeswoman for Greene, Broillet, Panish & Wheeler LLP, which represented the plaintiffs, said she could not comment on the award because it was sealed after being read in open court.

Representatives of Avjet declined to comment.

Eighteen people were killed when the Gulfstream III jet from Southern California attempted to land at dusk in Aspen during a brief but intense snowstorm.

During the trial, Brian Panish, the plaintiffs' attorney, said two planes ahead of the jet had tried the approach and turned around because visibility was bad.

"There was a reckless disregard for the safety of passengers," he said.

Avjet attorney Martin Rose said a cockpit voice recorder showed the flight crew discussed a curfew for landing at the airport after sunset and determined they had enough time.

Even in clear weather, the airport is one of the nation's most challenging for pilots because of its mountainous setting and the steep descent required to land.

Avjet admitted responsibility for pilot error before the trial, but Rose argued that $1 million each for the Withams and $1 million for Garcia were "reasonable" awards.

The Gulfstream was operated by Avjet and registered to Airborne Charter Inc., which is owned by the movie company Cinergi Pictures Entertainment Inc.

The plane was carrying 15 passengers to a birthday party and a weekend of skiing and snowboarding when it smashed into a Shale Bluffs hillside. A pilot, co-pilot and flight attendant were also aboard.

The company, which leases private jets to celebrities, dignitaries and corporate movers and shakers, has settled cases with some of the other crash victims' survivors.

Latest Firm News

Tilton v. Sempra - $15 million verdict for brain injury to minor resulting from a power company truck hitting a family vehicle.

Dominguez v. San Francisco - $21 million settlement while case was on appeal. Wrongful death of 4 year-old girl. Largest settlement ever paid by San Francisco.

Contreras v. State of California - $9 million settlment for amputation caused by a damaged freeway guardrail.

Don Gino Dominguez v. South Central Los Angeles Regional Care Center - $2 million verdict for wrongful death of a mentally and physically disabled 39 year-old man. Health care center left man unsupervised and he choked to death.

Doe v. Driver - $5.5 million settlement for death of pedestrian in an auto accident.

Doe v. Oil Refinery - $6.2 Million settlement for wrongful death and personal injury caused by the collapse of tank floating roof.

Avila v. Dresick Farms - $5.64 million dollar jury verdict for girl injured in truck v. van collision. Believed to be the largest verdict in the history of Imperial County, California.

Konrad, et al. v. Hewlett-Packard - Lawsuit filed against Hewlett-Packard for pretexting journalists and their families

Chief Warrant Officers v. Boeing, et al. - $13.55 million settlement for Army maintenance officers severely injured in the crash of Apache Longbow helicopter on a maintenance test flight during Operation Iraqi Freedom in Iraq.

Does v. Doe Auto Manufacturer: confidential multimillion dollar settlement on behalf of a family involved in on-road rollover of sport utility vehicle.

Does v. Van Manufacturer and Rental Company - Confidential multi-million dollar settlement on behalf of the survivors and family members of 14 church group members involved in a fifteen passenger van rollover.

Hill v. Titan Tire - Confidential multi-million dollar settlement for a 42 year old man who sustained brain injuries following a tire failure on his vehicle.

Dominguez v. San Francisco - $27.4 Million Verdict - Mother and 6 others witnessed a city truck driver run over her daughter on a sidewalk. City completely denied responsibility. Largest verdict ever against the City of San Francisco.

Sherman v. Courrege - $25.5 Million Verdict - Wrongful death of mother, father, and son hit by a drunk driver.

Sorenson v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway - $2.8 Million Verdict - Plaintiffs were parents of a 48 year-old man killed when a freight train crashed into a commuter train.

Doe v. Auto Manufacturer - Major Confidential Settlement Fuel fed fire caused by defectively designed 15 passenger van rollover. Many occupants killed or severely burned.

Flores v. Continental Tire - Major Confidential Settlement - Woman sustained paraplegia when the right rear tire on the family's Ford Windstar van experienced a tread belt separation, causing the vehicle to roll over.

Panish, Shea & Boyle on TV - The trial attorneys at Panish, Shea & Boyle have been on numerous televisions shows because of their involvement in many high profile cases.

11111 Santa Monica Blvd. Suite 700 Los Angeles CA 90025 • P:310-477-1700 • F: 310-477-1699 • Toll Free: 1-866-992-1700

Copyright © 2008 Panish, Shea & Boyle - Los Angeles Personal Injury Lawyers - Los Angeles Trial Attorneys - All rights reserved.

Plane Crash Lawyer Disclaimer: The personal injury, wrongful death, catastrophic injury, or other legal information presented at this site should not be considered formal legal advice, nor the formation of a lawyer or attorney client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. Please note that you are not considered a client until you have signed a retainer agreement and your case has been accepted by us.

Sitemap