Taste of Success

The Daily Journal Extra
By Eron Ben-Yehuda

At $100 million, the average award for 2005’s Top 10 Plaintiff’s Verdicts hit its lowest point since 2000. But plaintiffs’ lawyers need not fret: There’s plenty of work to do, especially when it comes to corporate scandals and patent battles, which spawned six of last year’s largest awards.

Griggs v. West-Pac Industries - $58 million

Third-degree burns covered 75 percent of Joseph B. Griggs’ body after the construction vehicle he operated caught fire, engulfing him in flames and prompting him to leap out of the vehicle to the ground.

In the product-liability suit that followed, the defense latched on to the fact that Griggs was a cigarette smoker.

But attempts by the defense at trial to blame a cigarette for causing the blaze back-fired, and a jury awarded Griggs $58 million.

Brian J. Panish of Santa Monica’s Greene, Broillet, Panish & Wheeler successfully argued that an allegedly defective mechanical part in the hydraulic system of a Caterpillar scraper, not a cigarette, caused the injuries to Griggs.

The jury returned the $58 million verdict, the sixth-largest in the state last year, against the importer and distributor of a rubber sealer called an O-ring, which allegedly failed, sending a spray of flammable hydraulic fluid, ignited by contact with the hot engine. Griggs v. West-Pac Industries, BC216425 (L.A. Super. Ct., verdict March 23, 2004).

“They made a huge tactical decision to fight the cause of the fire and say it was a cigarette,” says Christine Spagnoli, Panish’s co-counsel and fellow Green Broillet partner.

The accident occurred Sept. 10, 1998, as Griggs graded land for a self-storage facility in Valley Springs.

In opening statements, Steven J. Joffe, attorney for West-Pac, the O-ring’s distributor, referred to photographs taken Sept. 19, 1998, that show cigarette remnants on the floor of the construction vehicle’s cab.

After the opening remarks, Spagnoli brought out her side’s first witnesses: state fire officials who had inspected the cab the day of the fire and took photographs that showed no cigarettes.

Panish referred to the defense claim as a smokescreen.

“It never happened,” Panish says. “it’s ridiculous.”

Joffe stands by his approach at trial.

“O never went back to the photographs [showing cigarettes in the cab],” Joffe of Los Angeles’ Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker says. “I talked about the forensic evidence.”

A fire-reconstruction expert testified that the blaze started in the cab, not in the engine area, he says.

But Joffe says the jury had a difficult time objectively looking at the evidence because of Griggs’ horrific injuries.

“They just didn’t seem to be able to get around that,” he says.

Tom Y.K. Mei of Santa Ana, who represented the importer Tool Exchange, did not return repeated calls seeking comment.

In September, six months after the verdict, Tool Exchange settled for a confidential amount, while West-Pac paid out $24.75 million. Before trial, Caterpillar settled for $4.75 million. The defense blamed Griggs’ employer, Moyle Excavation, for not properly installing the O-ring. Moyle settled for $1 million before trial.

Defectos De Productos Pleito Del Negocio Desastres De la Aviación Pleito Farmacéutico Fraude Corporativo Responsabilidad Del Gobierno Daños Corporales Generales Abogados De la Muerte Ilícito Defectos de Automotriz

Las Noticias Más últimas del Firma

Chief Warrant Officers contra Boeing, y otros - $13.55 millones establecimiento para los oficiales del mantenimiento del ejército dañado seriamente en el desplome del helicóptero de Apache Longbow en un vuelo de prueba del mantenimiento durante la operación libertad iraquí de en Iraq.

Roes v. Doe Auto Manufacturer: confidential multimillion dollar settlement on behalf of a family involved in on-road rollover of sport utility vehicle.

Does v. Van Manufacturer and Rental Company - Confidential multi-million dollar settlement on behalf of the survivors and family members of 14 church group members involved in a fifteen passenger van rollover.

Hill v. Titan Tire - Confidential multi-million dollar settlement for a 42 year old man who sustained brain injuries following a tire failure on his vehicle.

Dominguez contra San Francisco - Verdicto para $27.4 Milliones - Madre y 6 otros atestiguaron un conductor del camino de la ciudad le aplastó su hija en una acera. La ciudad negó totalmente responsabilidad. El veredicto más grande siempre contra la ciudad de San Francisco.

Sherman contra Courrege - Verdicto para $25.5 Milliones - La muerte ilícita de la madre, del padre, y del hijo golpeó por un conductor borracho.

Sorenson contra Burlington Northern y Santa Fe Railway - Veredictos de $2.8 Millónes - los demandantes eran padres de un hombre de 48 años matado cuando un tren de la carga se estrelló en un tren del viajero.

Doe contra Auto Manufacturer - Establecimiento confidencial y importante del fuego hecho más grande del combustible causado por defectuoso diseñados del carro de carga de 15 passjeros que enrollado. Muchos inquilinos matados o quemados seriamente.

Flores contra Continental Tire - Establecimiento Confidencial Importante - La mujer sostuvo el paraplejia cuando el neumático posterior derecho en la carro de carga de Ford Windstar de la familia experimentó una separación de los canales de las llantas, haciendo el vehículo a dar una vuelta.