![]() |
|
The Los Angeles Area’s Best Lawyers 2006 Survey ResultsWest - Los Angeles Times Magazine : November 12, 2006 In 1999, attorney Brian Panish secured the largest personal injury verdict in U.S. history as lead counsel in a case against General Motors: a mind-boggling $4.9 billion for a family burned by a defectively designed fuel system. Mr. Panish has obtained over 100 million-dollar-plus verdicts and settlements, including 14 over $10 million. His partner, Adam Shea, is also a record-holder, securing the largest jury verdict in U.S. history - $55 million – in a case involving a tire defect. The pair is flanked by Kevin Boyle, another accomplished trial attorney who clerked for the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist and has sat on plaintiffs’ steering committees involving plane and train accidents. That’s not to mention his own remarkable trial record, with four of the last five cases he’s tried to jury verdict obtaining well over $10 million – each. Together, Mr. Panish, Mr. Shea and Mr. Boyle have obtained over $8 billion in verdicts and settlements for their clients. The three partners certainly make up an impressive team, helping people around the country who have been catastrophically injured in plane, train and automobile accidents, by defective products, harmful pharmaceuticals and business fraud. Their five-attorney firm, Panish, Shea & Boyle, also stands up for the families of those who have been killed through the negligence of others and is committed to one thing and one thing only: justice. And so it really comes as no surprise that the partners have been named as three of the Los Angeles area’s "Best Lawyers®." Their successes in the courtroom and at the negotiating table have definitely not gone unnoticed, and the firm was named in October 2005 to the National Law Journal’s "Plaintiffs’ Hot List" – a list of the top 12 plaintiffs’ firms in the country. Incidentally, theirs was the only Los Angeles firm selected for the list. And earlier this year the NLJ named Mr. Panish one of the 100 most influential attorneys in America and he was accepted into the Inner Circle of Advocates in 2004 – a highly coveted society made up of the nation’s top 100 civil trial attorneys. But recognition by their peers and in the media is just an added benefit that comes with the territory. What really matters – and what keeps these three coming to work every day – is their overriding desire to stand up for the everyday person facing terrible circumstances, through no fault of their own. When all is said and done, it’s about making a difference by punishing companies that put profits ahead of safety. That, say the three, is their job's ultimate reward.
|
Defectos De Productos
Pleito Del Negocio
Desastres De la Aviación
Pleito Farmacéutico
Fraude Corporativo
Responsabilidad Del Gobierno
Daños Corporales Generales
Abogados De la Muerte Ilícito
Defectos de Automotriz
Las Noticias Más últimas del FirmaChief Warrant Officers contra Boeing, y otros - $13.55 millones establecimiento para los oficiales del mantenimiento del ejército dañado seriamente en el desplome del helicóptero de Apache Longbow en un vuelo de prueba del mantenimiento durante la operación libertad iraquí de en Iraq. Roes v. Doe Auto Manufacturer: confidential multimillion dollar settlement on behalf of a family involved in on-road rollover of sport utility vehicle. Does v. Van Manufacturer and Rental Company - Confidential multi-million dollar settlement on behalf of the survivors and family members of 14 church group members involved in a fifteen passenger van rollover. Hill v. Titan Tire - Confidential multi-million dollar settlement for a 42 year old man who sustained brain injuries following a tire failure on his vehicle. Dominguez contra San Francisco - Verdicto para $27.4 Milliones - Madre y 6 otros atestiguaron un conductor del camino de la ciudad le aplastó su hija en una acera. La ciudad negó totalmente responsabilidad. El veredicto más grande siempre contra la ciudad de San Francisco. Sherman contra Courrege - Verdicto para $25.5 Milliones - La muerte ilícita de la madre, del padre, y del hijo golpeó por un conductor borracho. Sorenson contra Burlington Northern y Santa Fe Railway - Veredictos de $2.8 Millónes - los demandantes eran padres de un hombre de 48 años matado cuando un tren de la carga se estrelló en un tren del viajero. Doe contra Auto Manufacturer - Establecimiento confidencial y importante del fuego hecho más grande del combustible causado por defectuoso diseñados del carro de carga de 15 passjeros que enrollado. Muchos inquilinos matados o quemados seriamente. Flores contra Continental Tire - Establecimiento Confidencial Importante - La mujer sostuvo el paraplejia cuando el neumático posterior derecho en la carro de carga de Ford Windstar de la familia experimentó una separación de los canales de las llantas, haciendo el vehículo a dar una vuelta. |
Derechos de Autor © 2007 Panish, Shea y Boyle - Abogados De los Daños Corporales De Los Ángeles - Abogados Del Ensayo De Los Ángeles - Todos los derechos reservados.
Negación Del Abogado De Ensayo De Los Ángeles: Los daños corporales, la muerte ilícita, la lesión catastrófica, o la otra información legal presentada en este sitio no se deben considerar asesoramiento jurídico formal, ni la formación de una relación del cliente y abogado. Los resultados anteriores no garantizan ni predicen un resultado similar con respecto a cualquier materia futura. Observe por favor que le no consideran un cliente hasta que usted ha firmado un acuerdo de retención y su caso ha sido aceptado por nosotros.