![]() |
|
Stroller Recall Amputation Injury LawyersChild injuries resulting from accidents can be some of the most tragic and disturbing of all personal injury cases. From the day a child is born, their parents do everything possible to care for and protect them. Our children are widely viewed as our most precious treasures, which is why there is often an assumption children’s toys and products are manufactured, designed and created with the utmost care, with a particular eye towards insuring that they are safe. As this latest Stroller Recall illustrates, that is not always the case. Recall Announcement and LogisticsOn Wednesday, January 20, 2010, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced the recall of approximately 1.5 million Graco strollers for a serious amputation and laceration hazard. The defective strollers were made in China and sold at several popular retailers including Babies R Us, Kmart, Sears, Target, and Wal-Mart nationwide between October 2004 and December 2009. The recall of the Graco Children’s Products Inc. strollers was issued after reports were made of five children having their fingertips severed and two children received cuts on their fingertips. All of these serious injuries occurred when children put their fingers in the strollers’ canopy hinge while the canopy was being opened or closed. Certain model numbers of Graco Passage, Alano and Spree Strollers and Travel Systems are included in the recall. Manufacture dates and model numbers can be found on the lower inside portion of the back frame, which is above the back wheels of the strollers. The government has alerted consumers to stop using these defective and dangerous strollers and to contact Graco for a free repair kit. However, such warnings have come too late for those afflicted in the reported events, and it is unclear at this time how many unreported events may have occurred as well. History of Stroller Exposure to HarmAs the second major recall in the last few months relating to strollers and fingertip amputations and injuries, the CPSC is vigorously examining all strollers with the hinge mechanism design which has caused children disfigurement and pain and suffering. In November 2009, almost one million Maclaren strollers were recalled after 12 incidents of child fingertip amputation were reported due to a problematic hinge system. While the CPSC takes a closer look at the entire product line of strollers to establish what measures must be implemented to make sure that children are safe while in and around strollers, hopefully consumers will adhere to warnings and help prevent further fingertip amputation or injury. Defective Children Products Legal ActionIf your child has suffered from a dangerous or defective stroller, toy, or any other product, there are legal measures that you may take with the assistance of an attorney to seek restitution. The reputable product defect lawyers at Panish, Shea & Boyle LLP have been recognized by peers for consistent high level of success. In being recognized nationwide and in the state of California for their substantial settlements and verdicts for consumers, Panish, Shea & Boyle is prepared to put years of experience into action for the families of children who have suffered due to these recalled strollers and any other product. To learn more about what can be done regarding your specific child product defect injury or accident, please call Panish, Shea & Boyle today at 1-877-800-1700 or navigate through www.psandb.com to find out additional information regarding the success record of our plaintiffs law firm. |
Aviation Disasters
Wrongful Death
Toyota Accelerator Recall
Toyota 2010 Recall News
Stroller Recall
Train Accidents
Product Defects
CT Scan Radiation Injury
Bus Accidents
Business Litigation
Pharmaceutical Litigation
Yaz Side Effects
Hydroxycut Recall
Corporate Fraud
Government Liability
General Personal Injury
Automotive / Tire Defects
ATV/ Rhino Rollovers
Harbor / Port Injuries
More Practice Areas Latest Firm NewsMichael Nelsen v. Hillyard, Inc., et al. - Record $21 million verdict for Iraq war veteran. 27 year-old Iraqi War veteran Michael Nelsen injured when Hillyard, Inc. truck rear-ended Mr. Nelsen's vehicle on the I-15 freeway. Tilton v. Sempra - $15 million verdict for brain injury to minor resulting from a power company truck hitting a family vehicle. Dominguez v. San Francisco - $21 million settlement while case was on appeal. Wrongful death of 4 year-old girl. Largest settlement ever paid by San Francisco. Contreras v. State of California - $9 million settlement for amputation caused by a damaged freeway guardrail. Don Gino Dominguez v. South Central Los Angeles Regional Care Center - $2 million verdict for wrongful death of a mentally and physically disabled 39 year-old man. Health care center left man unsupervised and he choked to death. Doe v. Driver - $5.5 million settlement for death of pedestrian in an auto accident. Doe v. Oil Refinery - $6.2 Million settlement for wrongful death and personal injury caused by the collapse of tank floating roof. Avila v. Dresick Farms - $5.64 million dollar jury verdict for girl injured in truck v. van collision. Believed to be the largest verdict in the history of Imperial County, California. Konrad, et al. v. Hewlett-Packard - Lawsuit filed against Hewlett-Packard for pretexting journalists and their families Chief Warrant Officers v. Boeing, et al. - $13.55 million settlement for Army maintenance officers severely injured in the crash of Apache Longbow helicopter on a maintenance test flight during Operation Iraqi Freedom in Iraq. Does v. Doe Auto Manufacturer: confidential multimillion dollar settlement on behalf of a family involved in on-road rollover of sport utility vehicle. Does v. Van Manufacturer and Rental Company - Confidential multi-million dollar settlement on behalf of the survivors and family members of 14 church group members involved in a fifteen passenger van rollover. Hill v. Titan Tire - Confidential multi-million dollar settlement for a 42 year old man who sustained brain injuries following a tire failure on his vehicle. Dominguez v. San Francisco - $27.4 Million Verdict - Mother and 6 others witnessed a city truck driver run over her daughter on a sidewalk. City completely denied responsibility. Largest verdict ever against the City of San Francisco. Sherman v. Courrege - $25.5 Million Verdict - Wrongful death of mother, father, and son hit by a drunk driver. Sorenson v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway - $2.8 Million Verdict - Plaintiffs were parents of a 48 year-old man killed when a freight train crashed into a commuter train. Doe v. Auto Manufacturer - Major Confidential Settlement Fuel fed fire caused by defectively designed 15 passenger van rollover. Many occupants killed or severely burned. Flores v. Continental Tire - Major Confidential Settlement - Woman sustained paraplegia when the right rear tire on the family's Ford Windstar van experienced a tread belt separation, causing the vehicle to roll over. Panish, Shea & Boyle on TV - The trial attorneys at Panish, Shea & Boyle have been on numerous televisions shows because of their involvement in many high profile cases. |
Copyright © 2010 Panish, Shea & Boyle - California Personal Injury Attorneys - Automobile Product Liability Attorneys California - All rights reserved.
Stroller Recall Amputation Injury Lawyer Disclaimer: The defective stroller, stroller recall, product liability, defective stroller injury, amputation hazard stroller, or other legal information presented at this site should not be considered formal legal advice, nor the formation of a lawyer or attorney client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. Please note that you are not considered a client until you have signed a retainer agreement and your case has been accepted by us.
Website Design and Search Engine Optimization by SLS Consulting | Sitemap